printk time confusion?

[Johannes Berg]

> > Not sure whether the lockdep patches or something else is causing this
> > as I haven't checked w/o the patches yet, but I seem to be having some
> > confusion of printk timestamps:
> 
> Tried reverting the patches ?

No, not yet, I'll do that later today.


> > [  155.982345] ioctl32(gnome-terminal:6543): Unknown cmd fd(31) cmd(0000530b){t:'S';sz:0} arg(0fd7bbe0) on /dev/pts/8

> > Yes, these entries really were printed in that order. Btw, what's with
> > the unknown ioctls?
> 
> Proably ioctl's that lack a 32 bits conversion, you'll have to dig in
> the pty stuff to find out which ones it is and if it can be a problem...

Yeah, I'll have to see, I just thought Arnd might already know :)

johannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20080403/970c2cea/attachment.pgp>