printk time confusion?

[Johannes Berg]

Hi,

Not sure whether the lockdep patches or something else is causing this
as I haven't checked w/o the patches yet, but I seem to be having some
confusion of printk timestamps:

[...]
[  176.440255] iwl4965: No space for Tx
[...]
[  147.983705] ioctl32(gnome-terminal:6361): Unknown cmd fd(25) cmd(0000530b){t:'S';sz:0} arg(0fd7bbe0) on /dev/pts/2
[...]
[  173.589209] BUG kmalloc-2048: Poison overwritten
[...]
[  208.385226] ioctl32(gnome-terminal:6498): Unknown cmd fd(29) cmd(0000530b){t:'S';sz:0} arg(0fd7bbe0) on /dev/pts/6
[...]
[  139.026724] ioctl32(gnome-terminal:6521): Unknown cmd fd(30) cmd(0000530b){t:'S';sz:0} arg(0fd7bbe8) on /dev/pts/7
[...]
[  155.982345] ioctl32(gnome-terminal:6543): Unknown cmd fd(31) cmd(0000530b){t:'S';sz:0} arg(0fd7bbe0) on /dev/pts/8
[...]
[  218.918388] tg3: eth0: Link is down.
[...]

Yes, these entries really were printed in that order. Btw, what's with
the unknown ioctls?

Kernel version is 2.6.25-rc8-wl-04519-g6648ff7-dirty where -wl/-dirty
refers to wireless patches and the lockdep patches and otherwise it's
just -rc8.

johannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20080402/0eb63a87/attachment.pgp>