Porting RapidIO from ppc arch to powerpc arch in support of MPC8641D
Kumar Gala
galak at kernel.crashing.org
Thu May 24 00:21:48 EST 2007
On Wed, 23 May 2007, Zhang Wei-r63237 wrote:
> > So I'm taking the boot/dts/mpc8641_hpcn.dts and producing a new
> > mpc8641D_umem.dts with the following addition to the soc.
> >
> > srio at c0000 {
> > device_type = "srio";
> > compatible = "86xx,85xx";
We really need to think about this, is their really any difference between
srio and prio from a software view point?
> > reg = <c0000 20000>;
> > law = <400000000 e00000000>;
>
> Please use range = <0 address_start size>
The law should really be removed.
>
> > dbells = <0 ffff>;
> > mboxs = <0 4>;
>
> The dbells and mboxs can be removed. The default setting in rio is okay.
this could possibly be useful.
>
> > interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
> > interrupts = <30 1 31 1 32 1 35 1 36 1 37 1 38 1>;
> > };
> >
> Do you really use all of this interrupts? In my test, three <32 2 35 2
> 36 2> are okay, and the sense is 2.
I think we need to list all the interrupts possible from RIO, not just the
ones the driver happens to use.
- k
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list