network load 8245 vs. 8347E

Marc Leeman marc.leeman at gmail.com
Fri Jun 22 05:09:36 EST 2007


> You might just be lucky that 2.4 is less bloated and has to handle less
> features than 2.6 and it's lowering the CPU usage :)

Actually, I backported the e100 driver from the 2.6 series to the 2.4
series. It performed better. Perhaps I should re-sync again with what is
currently in the 2.6, but as I said, not much work is put in the older
platforms due to a load of proto 8347e boards being ported..

-- 
  greetz, marc
Long enough for me to see your blue backside meditating, but not long
enough for you to touch me.
	Rygel - PK Tech Girl
chiana 2.6.18-4-ixp4xx #1 Tue Mar 27 18:01:56 BST 2007 GNU/Linux
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20070621/4b0ece66/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list