SCSI errors on powerpc with 2.6.24-rc6-mm1
FUJITA Tomonori
fujita.tomonori at lab.ntt.co.jp
Fri Dec 28 16:30:43 EST 2007
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 11:15:37 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:08:25 +0530
> > Balbir Singh <balbir at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:18:50 +0530
> >>> Balbir Singh <balbir at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >>> I might break the IOMMU code. Can you reproduce it easily? If so,
> >>> reverting my IOMMU patches (I've attached a patch to revert them) fix
> >>> the problem?
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >>
> >> Yes, this patch fixes the problem for me.
> >
> > Thanks, so you can reproduce it easily, right?
> >
>
> Yes, quite easily
>
> > The problem is that I don't want to revert these changes. I'll see
> > how these changes cause the problem shortly.
>
> I'll try and find some bandwidth to review/test the patches and help you
> figure out the right solution.
Thanks,
Can you try this?
diff --git a/lib/iommu-helper.c b/lib/iommu-helper.c
index e7d8544..495575a 100644
--- a/lib/iommu-helper.c
+++ b/lib/iommu-helper.c
@@ -8,15 +8,20 @@
static unsigned long find_next_zero_area(unsigned long *map,
unsigned long size,
unsigned long start,
- unsigned int nr)
+ unsigned int nr,
+ unsigned long align_mask)
{
unsigned long index, end, i;
again:
index = find_next_zero_bit(map, size, start);
+
+ /* Align allocation */
+ index = (index + align_mask) & ~align_mask;
+
end = index + nr;
- if (end > size)
+ if (end >= size)
return -1;
- for (i = index + 1; i < end; i++) {
+ for (i = index; i < end; i++) {
if (test_bit(i, map)) {
start = i+1;
goto again;
@@ -50,9 +55,8 @@ unsigned long iommu_area_alloc(unsigned long *map, unsigned long size,
{
unsigned long index;
again:
- index = find_next_zero_area(map, size, start, nr);
+ index = find_next_zero_area(map, size, start, nr, align_mask);
if (index != -1) {
- index = (index + align_mask) & ~align_mask;
if (is_span_boundary(index, nr, shift, boundary_size)) {
/* we could do more effectively */
start = index + 1;
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list