[PATCH] [POWERPC] [v2] Improved documentation of device tree'ranges'.

[Stephen Neuendorffer]

I'm actually a little embarrassed that I didn't pick that nit myself.. :)

-----Original Message-----
From: David Gibson [mailto:david at gibson.dropbear.id.au]
Sent: Mon 12/3/2007 6:40 PM
To: Stephen Neuendorffer
Cc: grant.likely at secretlab.ca; linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] [v2] Improved documentation of device tree'ranges'.
 

On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 05:08:57PM -0800, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote:
> I was misled by the prior language.  I've attempted to clarify how
> 'ranges' are used, in particular, how to get an identity mapping.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer at xilinx.com>

Acked-by: David Gibson <david at gibson.dropbear.id.au>

Thanks for the update.  I particularly dislike the "1:1" terminology,
because in maths-speak *any* ranges translation is 1:1, unless it
includes overlapping ranges.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20071203/5c5c5af0/attachment.htm>