[PATCH] powerpc: fix os-term usage on kernel panic
Mike Strosaker
strosake at austin.ibm.com
Sat Dec 1 06:26:50 EST 2007
Will Schmidt wrote:
>>From my reading of the papr, I've got the impression that there are two
> possibilities.
>
> First, the os-term never returns, and it's up to the service processor
> to do whatever it's going to do. (call home, dump, something else).
> Nothing we can do there.
>
> Second, os-term returns, and it's up to the OS to call into power-off or
> system-reboot.
> I think this is more likely. I havn't followed the path back from
> machine_restart to see exactly how we got there, but probably means a
> bit more logic to decide whether to call into rtas_restart() or
> pSeries_power_off() after the call to machine_shutdown.
My understanding was that os-term is supposed to indicate an "abnormal"
termination, which is why it was initially only associated with a panic.
The os-term behavior is kind of complex; there is both a standard behavior, and
an "extended" behavior. You can determine if the extended behavior will be used
by looking for the ibm,extended-os-term property. I think POWER5 largely uses
the older behavior, and POWER6 uses the extended behavior.
I've never seen os-term return using the old behavior. Whether the partition
reboots after calling os-term depends on the setting of the
partition_auto_restart RTAS parameter. If partition_auto_restart is 1 when
os-term is called, the hypervisor will restart the partition and reset
partition_auto_restart to 0. The OS is supposed to set partition_auto_restart
back to 1 after it boots; that way, if the OS is failing to boot, the hypervisor
won't continually try to restart the partition without any hope of success.
That's why Linas sent a patch with a pSeries_auto_restart routine.
If the extended os-term behavior is used, the os-term call is supposed to return
unless the ibm,configure-kernel-dump call was previously used (to prepare for a
PHYP assisted dump). Would that explain why Linas and Will are seeing different
behaviors? I may have missed it, but I don't see a check for
ibm,extended-os-term anywhere.
- Mike
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list