[patch 06/10] 40x decrementer fixes
Sergei Shtylyov
sshtylyov at ru.mvista.com
Mon Aug 6 00:12:57 EST 2007
Hello.
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>> Why bother doing this?! This will only warrant you imprecise decrementer
>>>interrupts while it should be interrupting at the precise period currently (if
>>>you load PIT once)...
>>
>> I.e. the error will only accumulate. NAK.
> No, it won't since the timebase is always used as the reference.
I meant the error in the interrupt period itself (I know that this gets
accounted for) but that was a thinko anyway...
> Ben.
WBR, Sergei
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list