[PATCH] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers.

[Brad Boyer]

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:25:45AM -0400, David Woodhouse wrote:
> There are proper device numbers registered for pmac_zilog now. Use them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/serial/pmac_zilog.c b/drivers/serial/pmac_zilog.c
> index 752ef07..579266d 100644
> --- a/drivers/serial/pmac_zilog.c
> +++ b/drivers/serial/pmac_zilog.c
> @@ -99,9 +99,10 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(pmz_irq_mutex);
>  
>  static struct uart_driver pmz_uart_reg = {
>  	.owner		=	THIS_MODULE,
> -	.driver_name	=	"ttyS",
> -	.dev_name	=	"ttyS",
> -	.major		=	TTY_MAJOR,
> +	.driver_name	=	"ttyPZ",
> +	.dev_name	=	"ttyPZ",
> +	.major		=	204,
> +	.minor		=	192,
>  };
>  
>  
> @@ -1800,7 +1801,6 @@ static int __init pmz_register(void)
>  	
>  	pmz_uart_reg.nr = pmz_ports_count;
>  	pmz_uart_reg.cons = PMACZILOG_CONSOLE;
> -	pmz_uart_reg.minor = 64;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Register this driver with the serial core
> 

Shouldn't we have defines for these? It doesn't seem good to have more
magic numbers floating around in the code.

	Brad Boyer
	flar at allandria.com