[PATCH] General CHRP/MPC5K2 Platform and drivers support - to comment
Olof Johansson
olof at lixom.net
Fri Oct 20 03:43:29 EST 2006
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:39:01 +0200 Nicolas DET <nd at bplan-gmbh.de> wrote:
> We know this patch is not totaly compliant with Documentation/CodingStyle/.
>
> We would like people to comment and review it. This way we would provide
> a new patch with the changes required (if any) for an upcomming merge in
> the kernel.
Hi,
Like others have said, a monolithic patch like this is really hard to
review. Please split it up, there are several logical ways it could be
cut, drivers vs base platform support, etc.
First reaction from just browsing through it:
* Lots of SillyCaps, i.e. codingstyle issues, especially in the
bestcomm code
* No need to have filenames at top of files (they're even wrong in some
cases)
* You reinvented pr_debug() (everyone loves doing this, myself included)
* Some hardcoded baudrate stuff in the serial driver. Should probably
be passed in from somewhere -- device tree?
* Network drivers should be posted to netdev, not the arch list
More thorough review would be easier to do with split-up patches.
-Olof
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list