[RFC] Draft mpc52xx device tree specification

[John Rigby]

I agree with Kim.  I would like to see some kind of merge of this an
booting-without-of.

On 11/13/06, Kim Phillips <kim.phillips at freescale.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 01:47:29 -0700
> "Grant Likely" <grant.likely at secretlab.ca> wrote:
>
> >
> > This document specifies the requirements on the device-tree for mpc52xx
> > based boards.  These requirements are above and beyond the details
> > specified in the booting-without-of.txt document.
>
> well, the definition of the compatible property has a different bias.  I'm
> not saying the definition in booting-without-of is necessarily better (I
> know the document is too linux- and freescale-specific in places), I'm just
> saying that this document has good ideas, but is creating an unnecessary
> diversion, and amending booting-without-of would help maintain consistency
> with other platforms' efforts.
>
> Kim
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20061113/3528f99d/attachment.htm>