[PATCH][resend] udbg_printf() formatting attribute

Michael Ellerman michael at ellerman.id.au
Mon May 22 16:33:39 EST 2006

On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 12:52 -0400, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> On May 18, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >
> > I'm actually hoping to get rid of udbg_printf(), but if I can't we
> > should stick this in I guess. The real problem IMHO is that debug
> > printks rot because they're rarely compiled, not sure what to do about
> > that.
> Yeah, debug code always has that problem.  But I must say, whenever I  
> work with the x86 guys and I see how long they are _blind_ when they  
> boot it blows my mind.  Lets hope we don't go there.

Yeah nuts. Don't worry, when I say "get rid of udbg_printf()" I mean
"replace with printk".


Michael Ellerman
IBM OzLabs

wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20060522/7cf7f2fa/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list