[PATCH][resend] udbg_printf() formatting attribute

[Jimi Xenidis]

On May 18, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> I'm actually hoping to get rid of udbg_printf(), but if I can't we
> should stick this in I guess. The real problem IMHO is that debug
> printks rot because they're rarely compiled, not sure what to do about
> that.

Yeah, debug code always has that problem.  But I must say, whenever I  
work with the x86 guys and I see how long they are _blind_ when they  
boot it blows my mind.  Lets hope we don't go there.
-JX
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20060518/c2fb24c5/attachment.pgp>