2.6.17-mm2

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> This is caused by the vsprintf() changes.  Right now, if you do
>
> 	snprintf(buf, 4, "1111111111111");
>
> the memory at `buf' gets [31 31 31 31 00], which is not good.
>
> This'll plug it, but I didn't check very hard whether it still has any
> off-by-ones, or if breaks the intent of Jeremy's patch.  I think it's OK..
>   
Damn.  This patch doesn't look right; the intent is that 'end' point to 
just beyond the formatted string.  I'm pretty sure I tested this, since 
its the most obvious test.  Clearly not enough.  I'll look into it.

    J