32 bit userland on G5

[Johannes Berg]

On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 13:45 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:

> Why? Just because older hardware wasn't capable of enforcing the
> permissions, that doesn't mean that we shouldn't enforce them now.

Yeah, I was just thinking that there are programs relying on that and if
they run in the 32-bit compat mode they might rightfully do so... Dunno.

johannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 793 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20060613/ed8ea873/attachment.pgp>