Video Card to Lite5200
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Sat Jul 1 19:29:39 EST 2006
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 11:15 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <1151709367.27137.4.camel at localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
> >
> > > I don;t know - the patches were submitted to this list a long time
> > > ago; we added them to our repository without any additional problems;
> > > see http://www.denx.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=linux-2.6-denx.git
> >
> > Any reason why you keep that repository instead of submiting the patches
> > for proper upstream inclusion or to linuxppc-dev at least ?
>
> We submit patches every now and then, as time permits. My intention
> is to keep the differences between our tree and kernel.org minimal.
>
> But you know how this goes: just adding support for a new board means
> sending patches to the linuxppc_dev, mtd, i2c, usb, lm_sensors, ...
> mailing lists. Then you have to wait some time, then you resend. and
> you have to keep track of all these things. And the board support
> will not work before the last piece of the puzze has been accepted
> and merged and pushed upstream. All this takes a lot of effort and
> even more calendar time. We need a way to provide a solution to our
> customers fast - that's why we maintain our own development branch.
>
> I'd be happy if you could recommend a better approach to handle this.
Oh, it's fine to maintain a dev. branch, but I haven't seen you submit
stuff to linuxppc-dev for some time so I wanted to make sure you were
still on track :)
Ben.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list