[powerpc] Fix bogus BUG_ON() in in hugetlb_get_unmapped_area()
Segher Boessenkool
segher at kernel.crashing.org
Sat Dec 23 05:51:09 EST 2006
>>> + if (len > TASK_SIZE)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> Shouldn't that be addr+len instead? The check looks incomplete
>> otherwise. And you meant ">=" I guess?
>
> No. Have a look at the other hugetlb_get_unmapped_area()
> implementations. Because this is in the get_unmapped_area() path,
> 'addr' is just a hint,
Ah I missed this vital piece of information, thanks for the
explanation. Care putting in a code comment pointing this out?
> so checking addr+len would give bogus
> failures. This test is, I believe, essentially an optimization - if
> it fails, we're never going to find a suitable addr, so we might as
> well give up now.
Yes, it all makes sense now.
>>> - /* Paranoia, caller should have dealt with this */
>>> - BUG_ON((addr + len) > 0x100000000UL);
>>> -
>>
>> Any real reason to remove the paranoia check? If it's trivially
>> always satisfied, the compiler will get rid of it for you :-)
>
> Yes - this is the very bug on which was causing crashes - the "caller
> should have dealt with this" comment is wrong. The test has been
> moved into htlb_check_hinted_area() and now simply fails (and so falls
> back to searching for a suitable address), rather than BUG()ing.
Yep.
Cheers,
Segher
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list