RFC: Location for Device Tree Sources?
paulus at samba.org
Sat Aug 5 09:29:20 EST 2006
Tom Rini writes:
> But doesn't the representation include meaning?
No, in the sense that the device-tree representation doesn't define
what meaning or interpretation is to be given to particular node and
property names or to particular property values.
> I'll rephrase what I said to what I think we all agree. Changing
> existing fields meanings in incompatible ways and not somehow allowing
> that to still work (like by adding a flag so new trees are interpreted
> one way, old trees are fixed-up or whatever) is a problem.
Yes it's a problem. Not one that we want to solve by changing the dt
version number, though.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev