[RFC] New target 'cuImage' - compatibility uImage

[Milton Miller]

On Thu Aug  3 2006 10:30:13 AM CDT, Matthew McClintock wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 04:47 -0700, Li Yang-r58472 wrote:
> > If my understanding to Matt's idea is correct, it will be a good way,
> > IMHO.  How about use the naming of uwImage(U-boot Wrapped Image) or
> > utImage(u-boot device-Tree Image). 
> 
> I am completely open to a better name. Anyone else care to share their
> opinion?

Do newer versions of uboot support device tree kernels directly?  If not, then
I would say make this uimage.  Otherwise,  I would say uzImage unless we
decide to call the wrapper that adds the tree something else, like uImage.dt.

Or maybe its uImage and config vars say which it is.

milton