use of phy_connect() in drivers/net/gianfar.c ?
msm at freescale.com
Sun Oct 30 11:38:27 EST 2005
As far as I understand there are patches in the -mm tree with contain
the updates for the Gianfar driver. The issue is due to a
synchronization issue with the new PHY abstraction layer that was added.
I know Andy will not be back at his computer until Monday, you can wait
until then or look for the patch in the -mm tree.
On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 13:40 -0700, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> this commit in the 2.6.14 tree is breaking drivers/net/gianfar.c for
> Commit: bb40dcbb0fcebe1df08ba261483fcc38b307d063
> Author: Andy Fleming <afleming at freescale.com> 2005-09-24
> Committer: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at pobox.com> 2005-09-24
> Parent: acc4b985a6f8f22a0e826692894a4af234764001 ([PATCH]
> orinoco: Bump version to 0.15rc3.)
> Child: 8cee0cd5bec53b78dd3c43a73b27821a688133e6 ([netdrvr]
> delete CONFIG_PHYCONTROL)
> [netdrvr gianfar] use new phy layer
> Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming at freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at pobox.com>
> I get:
> drivers/net/gianfar.c: In function `init_phy':
> drivers/net/gianfar.c:410: error: structure has no member named
> Am I missing something?
> Best regards,
> Wolfgang Denk
> Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
> In C we had to code our own bugs, in C++ we can inherit them.
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
More information about the Linuxppc-dev