build failure for 2.6.11-mm2

[Kumar Gala]

right, but if you look back in the pervious -mm builds that past, they 
also did not have mkImage but still succeeded.

It appear some change is now report the lack of mkImage as a build 
error.  If this is desired behavior, should we maybe look at having a 
copy of its source in the kernel tree?

- kumar

On Mar 10, 2005, at 2:26 AM, Eugene Surovegin wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:10:04AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
>  > Do you have any ideas on what changes occurred in the makefiles to
> > cause the uImage related failures:
>  >
> > http://l4x.org/k/?d=2173
>
> This looks like mkimage is just not present on build host. I don't
> think it's included anywhere in kernel tree, so it must be installed
> separately.
>
> -- 
>  Eugene