[PATCH] 1/2 Start header file merger (Was: Re: Beginning Merger Patch)
arnd at arndb.de
Sat Aug 6 02:24:16 EST 2005
On Freedag 05 August 2005 16:59, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Well noone should even include kernel headers from user space :-) and my
> understanding is that glibc "sanitizes" its version of the kernel headers
Glibc doesn't change the header files too much, most of that is done in
the linux-libc-headers package, which is maintained separately from the
kernel and from glibc. There is some effort being put into keeping the
difference between that package and the kernel headers small.
Also, while using kernel headers directly from user space should be
considered a bug, Linus has stated before that he wants source code
that is broken in that way to keep working instead of breaking it
There is also klibc, which heavily relies on kernel headers by design.
> > Using CONFIG_64BIT instead of __powerpc64__ only within #ifdef __KERNEL__
> > would be correct but less consistant.
> The advantage of using CONFIG_64BIT as much as possible is that it shows
> us places that can be consolidated across the various architectures
> (which is a bit of a passion of mine :-)). And more consolidation should
> make life easier for the glibc folks in the long run.
AFAIK, in linux-libc-headers every usage of CONFIG_* outside of __KERNEL__
is a bug that needs to be fixed by the maintainer, so we really should not
I think it might be ok to use CONFIG_64BIT for files that are completely
inside #ifdef __KERNEL__, but I'd like to avoid stuff like:
#define __NR_sendfile64 226 /* only for 32 bit */
#endif /* __powerpc64__ */
#define cond_syscall(x) asm(".weak\t" #x "\n\t.set\t" #x ",sys_ni_syscall")
#else /* CONFIG_64BIT */
#define cond_syscall(x) asm(".weak\t." #x "\n\t.set\t." #x ",.sys_ni_syscall")
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
in a single file. Using __powerpc64__ consistantly has the advantage that
the casual reader can easily find all places that rely on 32/64 bit
definitions without having to understand why there are two different ways
to do the same thing.
Perhaps it works out better if this is combined with the split into
include/asm-powerpc/ and include/asm-powerpc/user, as mentioned in the
thread around http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0411.3/1663.html.
Then we could have CONFIG_64BIT everywhere in the real kernel headers and
__powerpc64__ in the user interface headers.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev