Linux 2.6.x on 8xx status

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Tom Rini wrote:

> Note that the old SCC enet driver, in linuxppc-2.5 at least is 'OK'.
> Not that it couldn't do with a cleanup and netdev person audit, but it's
> functional enough for me and my rpxlite to mount a root fs.

sorry to jump into this conversation late -- which "2.6.x" source tree 
is being used here?

for quite some time, i've just used the linuxppx-2.5 tree at 
ppc.bkbits.net.  but when someone refers to a 2.6.x tree, which one 
specifically is this?  just the latest BK update from www.kernel.org?
or is this a PPC-specific tree?

rday