Linux 2.6.x on 8xx status
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at mindspring.com
Tue Sep 21 04:02:43 EST 2004
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Tom Rini wrote:
> Note that the old SCC enet driver, in linuxppc-2.5 at least is 'OK'.
> Not that it couldn't do with a cleanup and netdev person audit, but it's
> functional enough for me and my rpxlite to mount a root fs.
sorry to jump into this conversation late -- which "2.6.x" source tree
is being used here?
for quite some time, i've just used the linuxppx-2.5 tree at
ppc.bkbits.net. but when someone refers to a 2.6.x tree, which one
specifically is this? just the latest BK update from www.kernel.org?
or is this a PPC-specific tree?
More information about the Linuxppc-dev