[PATCH] fix missing option in binutils version check
Olaf Hering
olh at suse.de
Tue Jun 15 04:07:34 EST 2004
On Mon, Jun 14, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 14, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > > Everyone who wants to build the latest and greatest kernel can also
> > > update binutils, its a no-brainer.
> >
> > ... which does, or doesn't compile a kernel? Does the latest and
> > greatest binutils and gcc automatically pass down -many, or does it fail
> > to compile because the assembler needs -many, but it's not being passed
> > along. That's what I asked.
>
> plain gcc 3.2.3 + binutils 2.15.91.0.1 is a challenge, because it passes
> -mppc instead of -many.
We should fix it like that:
diff -purN linux-2.6.7-rc3-bk6.orig/arch/ppc/Makefile linux-2.6.7-rc3-bk6/arch/ppc/Makefile
--- linux-2.6.7-rc3-bk6.orig/arch/ppc/Makefile 2004-06-14 15:23:35.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.7-rc3-bk6/arch/ppc/Makefile 2004-06-14 19:46:25.336997085 +0200
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ CPP = $(CC) -E $(CFLAGS)
cflags-$(CONFIG_4xx) += -Wa,-m405
cflags-$(CONFIG_PPC64BRIDGE) += -Wa,-mppc64bridge
+cflags-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC) += -Wa,-maltivec
CFLAGS += $(cflags-y)
--
USB is for mice, FireWire is for men!
sUse lINUX ag, nÜRNBERG
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list