[PATCH] fix missing option in binutils version check
olh at suse.de
Tue Jun 15 03:38:41 EST 2004
On Mon, Jun 14, Tom Rini wrote:
> > Everyone who wants to build the latest and greatest kernel can also
> > update binutils, its a no-brainer.
> ... which does, or doesn't compile a kernel? Does the latest and
> greatest binutils and gcc automatically pass down -many, or does it fail
> to compile because the assembler needs -many, but it's not being passed
> along. That's what I asked.
plain gcc 3.2.3 + binutils 220.127.116.11.1 is a challenge, because it passes
-mppc instead of -many.
> And everyone who wants to build the latest and greatest stable kernel
> should probably stick with a stable release of binutils and gcc. But
> that's just my 2 cents. :)
Lets just declare the hammer branch as stable, and older junk as
USB is for mice, FireWire is for men!
sUse lINUX ag, nÜRNBERG
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev