MPC5xxx code issues
trini at kernel.crashing.org
Thu Nov 20 02:58:34 EST 2003
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 08:04:06AM -0700, Dale Farnsworth wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 08:29:44PM +0000, Tom Rini wrote:
> > Must clean: These files need some sort of rewrite to look less like a
> > drop of commerical code into the kernel and more like working the
> > commercial code into the kernel:
> > arch/ppc/5xxx_io/bestcomm/capi/Makefile
> > arch/ppc/5xxx_io/bestcomm/code_dma/image_rtos1/Makefile
> > arch/ppc/5xxx_io/bestcomm/code_dma/image_rtos2/Makefile
> > arch/ppc/5xxx_io/bestcomm/include/dummy files (should these be needed?)
> The code beneath the arch/ppc/5xxx_io/bestcomm directory is supplied
> by Motorola. To ease the adoption of later revisions of this code,
> we made minimal modifications. Stupidly, the bestcomm code references
> stdio.h, stdlib.h, string.h, but doesn't use their contents, so we
> added empty files with these names.
.. but those files _should_ be OK anyhow, if I recall all of the include
> The Makefiles are also supplied by Motorola and are not used by Linux
> at all. We can safely omit them to reduce confusion.
Can you give me a list of all of the files we don't actually need?
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev