dale at farnsworth.org
Mon Nov 17 17:07:01 EST 2003
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 08:33:13PM +0000, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom & Dale,
> OK, so the discussion has stopped. What's happening now? I sent our
> stuff. Dale has added some modification. We have more works in the
> queue. I think it makes little sense to continue without a common
> code base.
> Can you give any estimates when something will go into a public tree,
> and what this will be, and which tree?
> If there is any reason for you not to use the "common" trees (like
> linuxppc_2_4_devel ?) yet, maybe we can at least put the current
> state into a more dedicated tree like
> So that we can at least avoid to duplicate efforts while the work is
> going on?
Have you had a chance to test my merged patch? Any bug fixes? I don't
think it's quite ready for linuxppc_2_4_devel, though it's close.
Per your suggestion above, I created
It incorporates my merged patch with the following changes from the
discussion in this thread:
o changed default CONFIG_MPC5xxx_FLASH_SIZE to 0x1000000
I think the name changes are a definite improvement. Thanks to all
for the input.
Please try this new tree and submit patches against it.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev