Retrieving linuxppc_2_4_devel corresponding to 2.4.19?
Dan Kegel
dank at kegel.com
Wed Feb 19 11:44:44 EST 2003
What's the best way to retrieve linuxppc_2_4_devel as of
2.4.19? Browsing through http://ppc.bkbits.net:8080/linuxppc_2_4_devel
I see that the right changeset appears to be 1.1091.1.23
(Lord only knows what those numbers mean):
> ChangeSet at 1.1091.1.23, 2002-08-03 16:26:58+10:00, paulus at samba.org
> Merge samba.org:/home/paulus/kernel/linuxppc_2_4
> into samba.org:/home/paulus/kernel/linuxppc_2_4_devel
The magic recipe we receved from the gods to retrieve that version is
ver=1.1091.1.23
bk clone -r$ver bk://ppc.bkserver.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel linuxppc_2_4_devel-$ver
cd linuxppc_2_4_devel-$ver
find . -type d -exec bk get {} \;
find . -name SCCS -print | xargs rm -rf
rm -rf RESYNC/
rm -rf PENDING/
rm -rf BitKeeper/
rm -f ChangeSet
That seems to work. However, I'm a bit concerned for several reasons:
0. it looks pretty hacky
1. there's no label on the changeset in question
2. Tom Rini said:
"... keep in mind that revision numbers are not constant, only TAGs,
and keys. Poking in the BK help should tell you how to go from
a rev to a key, and then back."
So I'm afraid that magic 1.1091.1.23 is going to get renumbered
sometime, and I'll have no way to retrieve a 2.4.19 that
works on ppc405. Poking around on bitkeeper.com's online
doc revealed no discussion of "keys", so I'm a bit mystified.
Can the list comment on the recipe I use to
retrieve a clean kernel source tree, and
on what the heck Tom Rini was talking about
with converting from a rev to a key and back?
Also, I see from the bitkeeper logs that linuxppc_2_4_devel
gets merged into from both linuxppc_2_4 and Linus's tree.
Am I right in assuming that I still want linuxppc_2_4_devel
for ppc405 support?
Thanks,
Dan
--
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list