[CFT] CONFIG_ALL_PPC and post-PReP (MVME2600, etc) systems
hollis at austin.ibm.com
Fri Nov 8 06:49:40 EST 2002
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 13:14, Tom Rini wrote:
> Hey all. I've just commited code to the linuxppc-2.5, linuxppc_2_4 and
> linuxppc_2_4_devel trees which should fix the problem seen when a
> CONFIG_ALL_PPC kernel is booted on a machine which is identified as
> 'prep' but lacks an MPC10x. I've tested my PowerStack, and it still
> works, but I'm unsure as to:
> a) Does this fix the problem seen on MVME2600? I would assume so.
> b) The broken HW which caused us to go from polling to int-ack, what
> host bridge was this exactly? We currently use the MPC10x-specific
> address on MPC105/MPC106/MPC107 (completeness), and based on the
> original comment I assume that it was MPC10x HW. Can someone confirm?
Sure, it was MPC105.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev