can/should we use gcc 3.1 to compile kernels
trini at kernel.crashing.org
Sat Jun 8 06:19:06 EST 2002
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 03:44:56PM -0400, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
> Not too bad warnings-wize excpet for the controlfb.c where it constanly
> gave a funny warning about "pasting ->".
Sounds right. I think there was a few other things too..
> It did this for every occurence of the macro CNTRL_REG which I must admit
> has two ## which I think gcc was misinterpreting somehow.
#define x(foo) a_## foo ##_b
A semi-common thing, like we do in indirect_pci.c ? Or was it something
> Other than that just the occaissioanal wanring about unused variables and
> things like that.
Lots of the USB stuff uses __FUNCTION__ which gcc-3.1 isn't happy
> I should have saved the build.log
Tom Rini (TR1265)
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev