SBS Palomar II/IV/V port
val at nmt.edu
Thu Oct 11 04:24:15 EST 2001
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 02:25:03PM -0700, Michael Sokolov wrote:
> Some other bi_rec fixes may be needed (initrd ones are broken I think).
Indeed! This is on my list of stuff to do - straighten out once and
for all how BI_INITRD works and then rewrite the Gemini boot process
to use it. It seemed like we had two interpretations:
1. The BI_INITRD boot record contains the start address and the size
of the initrd.
2. The BI_INITRD boot record contains the entire initrd itself (as a
really large boot record).
I have no preference either way, I just want someone to tell me which
way we're going to do it. :)
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev