CONFIG_ALL_PPC

Olaf Hering olh at suse.de
Thu Nov 29 11:19:41 EST 2001


On Thu, Nov 29, Paul Mackeras wrote:

>
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
>
> > It's a difficult choice ;)
> >
> > What about CONFIG_COMMON_PPC ? Still a bit misleading, but probably
> > better than CONFIG_ALL_PPC...
>
> You know, what I am really tempted to do is to split out prep again
> and have a CONFIG_PPC_OPENFIRMWARE to indicate pmac and chrp and
> anything else that has a working OF.  But Olaf would kill me... :)

Hmm, why? :)



Gruss Olaf

--
 $ man clone

BUGS
       Main feature not yet implemented...

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/





More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list