CONFIG_ALL_PPC
Olaf Hering
olh at suse.de
Thu Nov 29 11:19:41 EST 2001
On Thu, Nov 29, Paul Mackeras wrote:
>
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
>
> > It's a difficult choice ;)
> >
> > What about CONFIG_COMMON_PPC ? Still a bit misleading, but probably
> > better than CONFIG_ALL_PPC...
>
> You know, what I am really tempted to do is to split out prep again
> and have a CONFIG_PPC_OPENFIRMWARE to indicate pmac and chrp and
> anything else that has a working OF. But Olaf would kill me... :)
Hmm, why? :)
Gruss Olaf
--
$ man clone
BUGS
Main feature not yet implemented...
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list