geert at linux-m68k.org
Wed Nov 28 02:18:57 EST 2001
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 09:59:59AM -0500, Dan Malek wrote:
> > Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > > Does anyone have any comments or objections?
> > That's a pretty good idea, and I have another one. Name the
> > directory include/asm-ppc/ppc-platforms or something, then
> > have a symbolic link
> > include/asm/platform -> include/asm-ppc/ppc-platforms/<board-file>
> > That way we can just #include <platform.h> instead of having lots
> > of ifdefs in upper level files to determine which one is needed. If
> > we are moving files around, let's have some effect on actually making
> > it easier to use them, too.
> Yes, this is similar to what has worked well in the arm tree.
Note that ARM has include/asm-arm/arch-$(PLATFORM)/, i.e. a whole directory
with platform-specific files, not a single header file.
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev