Changes to PPC Linux required for GCC 3.1
minyard at acm.org
Fri Dec 7 16:22:56 EST 2001
Tom Rini wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 06:59:14PM -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>Tom Rini wrote:
>>>I think the reason this wasn't applied is that Paul said something about
>>>thiws being horriyingly ugly. Corey, can you post a patch that changes
>>>RELOC(x) into a function and nothing else? :)
>>My original patch has the function.
>Your patch had other fixes too tho.
I can take the patch and delete the files that don't pertain. I'll wait
until we are sure this is the way the maintianers want to do it, though.
>>I prefer the macro, it may be a
>>little uglier but it removes a dependency between the include file and
>Er, say what? The macro is in the include file now...
I meant the include file and the C file.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev