Changes to PPC Linux required for GCC 3.1
Tom Rini
trini at kernel.crashing.org
Thu Dec 6 14:38:23 EST 2001
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 06:59:14PM -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
>
> Tom Rini wrote:
>
> >
> >I think the reason this wasn't applied is that Paul said something about
> >thiws being horriyingly ugly. Corey, can you post a patch that changes
> >RELOC(x) into a function and nothing else? :)
>
> My original patch has the function.
Your patch had other fixes too tho.
> I prefer the macro, it may be a
> little uglier but it removes a dependency between the include file and
> the source.
Er, say what? The macro is in the include file now...
> It needs to be commented though, the reason for it's
> wierdness is not really clear.
Well, that is somewhat true. But the early boot stuffs are somewhat
mysterious from time to time anyways :)
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list