akuster at mvista.com
Sat Dec 1 11:19:12 EST 2001
Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Basically I want the knowledge that "because this is a 405gp chip we
> must have an XYZ ethernet controller at address FOO using interrupt
> N" to be concentrated in one place, not spread out through the
> code. Then when IBM brings out a 405gp-A that has two XYZ's (neither
> of which are at the same address as in the 405gp) there is just one
> place that we have to change.
Actual its an issue for the NP405H & L. I will outline how this can be
addressed soon + all the other 4xx internal pripherials.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev