xf 4.0.0/1 with rage II/rage pro -- should the ati driver work?

[R Shapiro]

Michael Schmitz writes:
 > That might be due to a bug in the ati driver (last time I rsynced in
 > mid-July, there was a bug in Mach64PPCPreInit:
 > [...]
 > 	/* hack */
 > 	pScrn->videoRam = 2048;
 > [...]
 > The hack to unconditionally set pScrn->videoRam to 2M should be removed,


The rsync of atimach64ppc.c I got earlier today doesn't have this
unconditonal assignment hack anymore.  The hardwired vram setting
certainly could have caused at least some of the problems I was
running into on Friday.  I'll try this new ati driver first thing
Monday and report back.



--
reshapiro at mediaone.net


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/