CONFIG_PPC != Mac
Michael Schmitz
schmitz at zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de
Thu Aug 3 19:33:51 EST 2000
> > While I also enjoyed the flexibility on m68k, some of it was paid for in
> > terms of increased complexity in head.S and entry.S (and especially head.S
> > wasn't a bit pretty). I'm not sure how your trouble with the embedded
> > systems can be solved, we kept separate head.S versions for Macs and other
> > machines for a while as well because things just got too confusing. Maybe
> > we need to keep separate versions for embedded and other systems here?
>
> Hi All,
>
> I think we don't want to get too carried away with pulling things
> apart here. Afterall I think we'd all like to be able to continue to
> pick up a distro with a bootable kernel that works over a wide variety
> of machines instead of 10 different kernels to choose from depending on
> which box you've got.
That's exactly what won't work now. A kernel built for PowerMac won't work
on embedded systems or APUS, and maybe not even on PReP or CHRP.
> Now obvoiusly I'm going a little overboard here but hopefully you
> might see what I'm saying. Granted embedded boxes aren't going to care
> about booting from the install cd but I think the rest of us sure do!
I don't see where we would conflict, all I said was maybe keep embedded
separate. By all means unify the rest if at all possible.
Michael
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list