aty128 and offb and linux-2.3.99pre6
Michel Lanners
mlan at cpu.lu
Mon Apr 24 16:51:12 EST 2000
Hi all,
On 19 Apr, this message from Geert Uytterhoeven echoed through cyberspace:
> What about other frame buffer devices, like e.g. matroxfb? Does it still work
> after this patch? If yes, we can get rid of matrox_of_init() as well.
It does work... but it changes the order my fbs are detected. Grrr....
;-)
> I'd really like to get rid of all these:
>
> s3triofb_init_of()
> imsttfb_of_init()
> chips_of_init()
> matrox_of_init()
> control_of_init()
> valkyrie_of_init()
> platinum_of_init()
> clgen_of_init()
>
> These are all PCI based, so they can be found using PCI probing and marked
> busy using PCI resource management.
control is only PCI-based with some abstractions.... It can, however,
be made to look entirely like a PCI device, if you can avoid poking at
it afterwards.
I have patches for control anyway (adding it to the PCI device chain,
precisely); so I might try and implement the changes for control. Or
are you already working on this, Dan?
Cheers
Michel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michel Lanners | " Read Philosophy. Study Art.
23, Rue Paul Henkes | Ask Questions. Make Mistakes.
L-1710 Luxembourg |
email mlan at cpu.lu |
http://www.cpu.lu/~mlan | Learn Always. "
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list