Physical disk size 65536 blocks for an 8G drive
Derrik Walker v2.0
firebug at apk.net
Sun Nov 7 09:22:03 EST 1999
I just went though this last night. I ended up manually formating the
disk with /sbin/mke2fs -i 2048 This will get it formated with 2k inodes.
However, I think I could have used 4096 and been fine.
Hope this helps.
Purhaps there is a page for my Mucking Around With Computers Page.
On Sat, 6 Nov 1999, Jim Hickstein wrote:
> Sorry to post what amounts to a support question on -dev, but it did not
> get an answer on -user. I'm afraid it's too arcane, so I appeal to you.
> I have a PBG3 Wallstreet and recently bought a new 8GB drive to put in
> it, an IBM DYLA-28100. MacOS 8.6, update the drivers, so far, so good.
> I managed to get pdisk to make partitions (after umounting /mnt/cdrom
> from /dev/hda to silence a warning in writing the partition table).
> MacOS runs fine, with volumes in hda10 (5GB hfs+) and hda11 (600MB hfs),
> _above_ Linux. But Linux barfs mounting / on /dev/hda7 (and even worse
> for /usr on /hda9), saying that the superblock reports a size of
> so-and-so (~131000 for /) but the _physical size of the disk_ is 65536 blocks.
> Evidently something is reporting a block count of 0xffff, and it's
> getting incremented to tell me the "length". Yet, the drive probes
> correctly (apparently) and reports a size of 7145MB or so.
> fsck is the one telling me this, for /dev/hda7. For /dev/hda9, it
> really complains, saying that inode 3 is corrupt, etc. Part of hda7 is
> below 0xffff blocks, but all of hda9 is above it.
> Any ideas? This is 2.2.10 off the Q3 distribution.
mailto:firebug at apk.net
Thinking Different??? Think Linux!
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev