2.2.x kernels and u grading software to minimum req.
Paul Barrette
barretp at mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca
Wed Mar 3 08:17:42 EST 1999
I have 2.2.2 running on R4. I read the
/usr/src/linux/Documentation/Changes file and noticed that there are a
number of updates needed (see below). I have noticed problems with tx
packets:
root ~># ifconfig
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
EtherTalk Phase 2 addr:0/0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
RX packets:277 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>> TX packets:0 errors:79193 dropped:277 overruns:0 carrier:0 coll:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:05:02:70:06:45
inet addr:10.0.0.1 Bcast:10.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
EtherTalk Phase 2 addr:65280/34
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:6539 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:6737 overruns:5 carrier:0 coll:0
Interrupt:14 Base address:0x1000
ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:130.113.xx P-t-P:130.113.xx Mask:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:350 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>> TX packets:0 errors:9477 dropped:341 overruns:0 carrier:0 coll:0
I'm not sure what TX does, but when I upgraded to net-tools-1.49 on an
intel RH 5.1 box, these errors (no ppp0 there) disappeared. Problem is
that net-tools-1.49 doesn't compile without errors on linuxppc. (or I'm not
able to correct these errors).
I also noticed that the following pkgs need to be updated from the standard
R4 dist:
insmod (I compiled 2.1.121 a while ago), egcs-2.90.25 980302, ld,
libc-1.99.so, procps 1.2.7, pstree 16, net-tools1.432, NFS 2.2beta29,
util-linux 2.6
Now the $10 question, are there rpms around? I had a look at
ftp.linuxppc.org, no luck except for egcs and libc (which I will download
and re try compilation.)
Should I be concerned with these (apart from net-tools I think I can squeek
by)? Are others upgrading or noticing problems having done so?
>>>>>>>>>>
Upgrade to at *least* these software revisions before thinking you've
encountered a bug! If you're unsure what version you're currently
running, the suggested command should tell you.
- Kernel modules 2.1.121 ; insmod -V
- Gnu C 2.7.2.3 ; gcc --version
- Binutils 2.8.1.0.23 ; ld -v
- Linux libc5 C Library 5.4.46 ; ls -l /lib/libc.so.*
- Linux libc6 C Library 2.0.7pre6 ; ls -l /lib/libc.so.*
- Dynamic Linker (ld.so) 1.9.9 ; ldd --version or ldd -v
- Linux C++ Library 2.7.2.8 ; ls -l /usr/lib/libg++.so.*
- Procps 1.2.9 ; ps --version
- Procinfo 15 ; procinfo -v
- Psmisc 17 ; pstree -V
- Net-tools 1.49 ; hostname -V
- Loadlin 1.6a
- Sh-utils 1.16 ; basename --v
- Autofs 3.1.1 ; automount --version
- NFS 2.2beta40 ; showmount --version
- Bash 1.14.7 ; bash -version
- Ncpfs 2.2.0 ; ncpmount -v
- Pcmcia-cs 3.0.7 ; cardmgr -V
- PPP 2.3.5 ; pppd -v
- Util-linux 2.9g ; chsh -v
--
Paul Barrette
Ph.D. candidate, dept. of Classics
System Administrator
McMaster University
umbra loco deerat; qua postquam parte resedit
Dis genitus vates et fila sonantia movit,
umbra loco venit. (Ov. Met. 10. 88 ff.)
http://www.humanities.mcmaster.ca/~barrette/
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]]
[[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request at lists.linuxppc.org ]]
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list