PowerBook '99 ethernet problem.
Hollis R Blanchard
hollis+ at andrew.cmu.edu
Fri Jul 30 05:25:08 EST 1999
On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, laveren wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm using R5, it works great, but the ethernet hardware is not
> responding ie:
>
> during the boot precess the eth is recognized as
> eth0: BMAC+ at 00:50:e4:7a:37:51
> after booting I issue:
>
> # ifconfig eth0 192.168.3.2 broadcast 192.168.3.255 netmask 255.255.255.0
> # ifconfig eth0
> eth0 Link encap: Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:e4:7a:37:51
> inet addr: 192.168.3.40 Bcast:192.168.3.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU: 1500 Metric: 1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> Interrupt:42 Base address:0xc000
>
> # route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination GW GenMask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 192.168.3.40 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
> 192.168.3.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
>
> So the net is ok but when i try to ping any box in the net nothing
> happends:
>
> # ping -c 5 192.168.3.1
> PING 192.168.3.1 (192.168.3.1): 56 data bytes
>
> --- 192.168.3.1 ping statistics ---
> 5 packets transmited, 0 received, 100% packet loss
>
> #ifconfig eth0
> XXX --- Same as before but
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>
> Then I guess that no packets were efectively transmited by the kernel eth
> driver. Why?? What wrong?? There is other things yet, after boot
> /dev/interrupts says:
> CPU0
> XX: XXX
> 32: 0 PMAC-PIC BMAC-txdma
> 33: 0 PMAC-PIC BMAC-rxdma
> 42: 0 PMAC-PIC BMAC-misc
>
> after the ping the interrupts remains as before so no interrupts were
> handled by the driver, well if no packets were TX as i guess no intr were
> generated that coherent. but if I issue:
>
> #ifconfig eth0 down
> #ifconfig eth1 up
> #ifconfig eth0
> XXX --- same as before
> RX packets:0 errors:1 dropped:1 overruns:0 frame:1
> TX packets:1 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> XXX --- same as before
>
> why r RX errors? and why i try to TX 1 packet??
>
> Any ideas why is this appening to me????
You mentioned this is a Lombard in the subject, yes? Have you applied the
ethernet patch at www.terraplex.com/~dburcaw/bmac.patch and recompiled your
kernel?
-Hollis
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list