Restructuring Efforts

Jesper Skov jskov at
Thu Feb 18 19:44:36 EST 1999

>>>>> "Gabriel" == Gabriel Paubert <paubert at> writes:
Gabriel> I had the impression that the APUS I/O accesses had to use
Gabriel> non byte swapped instruction, so that merging the APUS with
Gabriel> the other would be hard. Is there something I missed ?

True, APUS doesn't require byte swapping. But I don't see how this
makes it hard to integrate APUS.

Gabriel> I don't want the kernel to execute conditional code or to
Gabriel> call a subroutine for every I/O access, this is bloat and/or
Gabriel> inefficiency for the sake of it.

This is a valid concern. I don't know if it's possible to do anything
about this. 

It may be the case that none of the Amiga drivers use the same IO
macros as other drivers use. As I remember it, there are two set of
macros. But it's a long time since I looked at that, I could be wrong.


[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to  Cc linuxppc-dev  if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]]
[[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request at ]]

More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list