modes "default" unfit for general use?
brad at pht.com
Fri Feb 5 16:33:12 EST 1999
Is it a mistake to have a distribution ship with modes "default" in the
default x windows configuration?
> These days I use video=atyfb:vmode:17 and the XF86Config below
I was trying to use modes "default" on this iMac. Paul was using concrete
graphics modes. That made all the difference in getting a usable screen.
This brings to light a general problem: is modes "default" being supported
by any developers?
1- It doesn't work with virtual screen sizes (modes "default" on imac
results in a 1024x6128--yes, six thousand--virtual screen size and the x
server ignores attempts to set the virtual screen size in XF86Config)
2- It appears that some video drivers just don't support modes "default"
eg iMac. The result on this machine is a white screen flecked with
artifacts and a mouse that appears and disappears, leaving a trail behind
so... if we abandon modes default, what modeline generators are out there
that take the output of `fbset -x` and output a complete XF86Config? is
there a safe way to cycle through all the supported vmodes automatically
and capture these settings for several resolutions?
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]]
[[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request at lists.linuxppc.org ]]
More information about the Linuxppc-dev