[linux-fbdev] Re: readl() and friends and eieio on PPC
paulus at cs.anu.edu.au
Thu Aug 12 09:52:31 EST 1999
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen at cern.ch> wrote:
> I will have to disagree with you on this one, I consider the PPC
> implementation to be very broken in this regard.
"Very broken" - because drivers work and there is no measurable
performance impact?? !!! ??
The only possible argument for *not* having the eieio in readl/writel
is that it hurts performance (actually and measurably, not just
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
More information about the Linuxppc-dev