asun at saul1.u.washington.edu
Thu Apr 8 03:27:40 EST 1999
My top priority is to get away from having an Amiga directory under
arch/ppc (or arch/ppc/mach_m68k). I would prefer to move all mach
drivers into a new mach hierarchy (so there would be e.g. mach/amiga
in the root of the kernel sources just as we now have arch/m68k).
yep. actually, we probably should call it "machine" as that has less
of a chance of getting confused with the mach microkernel given that
arch/mach has the possibility to show up in 2.3.x as well.
Also, the files that do not look like that are so because Jes (m68k
maintainer) didn't like '#ifdef __powerpc__' or CONFIG_APUS in
arch/m68k specific files... Which I agree with (kind of). With the
mach hierarchy, though, both arguments becomes moot and I'll fix up
the sources to my liking ;)
heh. luckily, most of the nubus stuff can be done by adding more
gestalt values. hmm, i do have wonderful things like #ifdef
__powerpc__ in the via_write/via_read code to do deal with memory
barriers and such.
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
More information about the Linuxppc-dev