[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: fsi: Add optional chip-id to CFAMs
robh at kernel.org
Tue Jul 17 00:13:10 AEST 2018
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 8:07 PM Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-07-06 at 11:48 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > We've generally standardized around "label" for things like slots,
> > > ports, connectors, etc. that need to be physically identified.
> > Yes, label would be an option too, probably a better one that aliases.
> > > "slot-names" it seems hasn't gotten used for FDT. Since there aren't
> > > DT's published for OF based systems nor any documentation, newbies
> > > like me (that only have 8 years of DT experience) don't have any
> > > insight into how things used to be done.
> > In a pretty much ad-hoc way :-) In this case, though, chip-id is a
> > simple solution and works well (and I have the code already written and
> > tested :-)
> I want to try to get that stuff upstream. Do you still object to the
> chip-id's after our discussion ? The labels aren't that great really...
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
More information about the Linux-aspeed