[PATCH 1/3] uacce: supports device isolation feature
yekai(A)
yekai13 at huawei.com
Wed Jun 15 11:07:57 AEST 2022
On 2022/6/14 22:14, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
>
>
> On 2022/6/14 下午8:29, Kai Ye wrote:
>> UACCE add the hardware error isolation API. Users can configure
>> the error frequency threshold by this vfs node. This API interface
>> certainly supports the configuration of user protocol strategy. Then
>> parse it inside the device driver. UACCE only reports the device
>> isolate state. When the error frequency is exceeded, the device
>> will be isolated. The isolation strategy should be defined in each
>> driver module.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kai Ye <yekai13 at huawei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1 at hisilicon.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/uacce.h | 15 ++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c b/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
>> index b6219c6bfb48..4d9d9aeb145a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
>> @@ -12,6 +12,20 @@ static dev_t uacce_devt;
>> static DEFINE_MUTEX(uacce_mutex);
>> static DEFINE_XARRAY_ALLOC(uacce_xa);
>> +static int cdev_get(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct uacce_device *uacce;
>> + struct device **t_dev = data;
>> +
>> + uacce = container_of(dev, struct uacce_device, dev);
>> + if (uacce->parent == *t_dev) {
>> + *t_dev = dev;
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int uacce_start_queue(struct uacce_queue *q)
>> {
>> int ret = 0;
>> @@ -346,12 +360,47 @@ static ssize_t region_dus_size_show(struct
>> device *dev,
>> uacce->qf_pg_num[UACCE_QFRT_DUS] << PAGE_SHIFT);
>> }
>> +static ssize_t isolate_show(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct uacce_device *uacce = to_uacce_device(dev);
>> +
>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n",
>> uacce->ops->get_isolate_state(uacce));
> Are these two isolate ops required or optional?
> Do we need consider NULL pointer?
>
> Thanks
> .
>
Yes, need to consider NULL pointer.
Thanks
kai
More information about the Linux-accelerators
mailing list