Pulls and drive strengths in the pinctrl world

[Tomasz Figa]

On Wednesday 15 of May 2013 15:01:23 Doug Anderson wrote:
> Tomasz,
> 
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> > This will be hard, since the phandle in interrupt-parent is
> > represented by an IRQ domain in kernel code. One-interrupt IRQ
> > domains seem a bit awkward to me.
> > 
> > Since we are already going to modify the binding, let's think a bit
> > more about this problem and try to figure out a solution that doesn't
> > add any disadvantages (at least any significant) to avoid such
> > situation in future again.
> 
> I'm definitely not super familiar with the implementation at that
> level of detail, so don't take my proposed syntax as something I've
> thought all the way through.  ...but hopefully you understand what I'm
> getting at in terms of eliminating duplication?

Yes. I don't like the current way too much either, duplication being one 
of the reasons.

Best regards,
Tomasz