[PATCH v2] of: Add more stubs for non-OF builds

[Alexander Shiyan]

On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 06:31:11 +0100
Grant Likely <grant.likely at linaro.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:39:22 +0400, Alexander Shiyan <shc_work at mail.ru> wrote:
> > Patch adds of_get_next_child and of_get_next_available_child
> > stubs for non-OF builds.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work at mail.ru>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/of.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> > index 1fd08ca..c086c1a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/of.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> > @@ -366,8 +366,17 @@ static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void)
> >  	return false;
> >  }
> >  
> > -#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> > -	while (0)
> > +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_child(
> > +	const struct device_node *node, struct device_node *prev)
> > +{
> > +	return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_available_child(
> > +	const struct device_node *node, struct device_node *prev)
> > +{
> > +	return NULL;
> > +}
> >  
> >  static inline struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(
> >  					const struct device_node *node,
> > @@ -376,6 +385,9 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(
> >  	return NULL;
> >  }
> >  
> > +#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> > +	while (0)
> > +
> 
> Why is the for_each_child_of_node() getting moved?

Please forget this patch, this is no longer needed.
A move was to preserve the sort order for "OF" and "non-OF".
Thanks.

-- 
Alexander Shiyan <shc_work at mail.ru>